<div>ojwb have also suggested this on the IRC channel, thanks olly!<br><br>Cheers.<br></div>Billy<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Olly Betts <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:olly@survex.com">olly@survex.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:08:47AM +0800, Han Jiang wrote:<br>
> As far as I know, the operation of index file, e.g. IndexReader, has<br>
> changed quite some (Lucene3.5 File<br>
</div>> Format<<a href="http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/versions/3_5_0/fileformats.html#Index%20File%20Formats" target="_blank">http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/versions/3_5_0/fileformats.html#Index%20File%20Formats</a>>)<br>
<div class="im">> , while the idea page itself still linked to an old 3.0<br>
</div>> version<<a href="http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/versions/3_0_3/fileformats.html" target="_blank">http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/versions/3_0_3/fileformats.html</a>>.<br>
<div class="im">> Since it doesn't seem a simple work to cope with all the versions, shall we<br>
> just implement to support the old 3.0 format, or a more stable version?<br>
<br>
</div>Thanks for noticing this - this idea was carried over from last year's<br>
list, and that's why the link points to an old version. I've updated<br>
the link on the wiki to the newer one you gave above.<br>
<br>
I think it makes sense to support the latest version as the priority,<br>
with support for older versions possibly useful if there's time.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Olly<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Han Jiang<br><br>EECS, Peking University, China<br>Every Effort Creates Smile<br> <br>Senior Student<br><br>