Ok. Will keep that in mind while making the proposal. Will ensure that the pros and cons of both the options are weighted and analysed carefully, and then only it is finalised whether complete re-implementation is required or it can be done without a complete rewrite to achieve the maximal improvement.<div>
<br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Sehaj<br><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Olly Betts <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:olly@survex.com">olly@survex.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:37:11PM +0530, Sehaj Singh Kalra wrote:<br>
> @Olly : Sir<br>
<br>
There's no need for formalities around here BTW.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> As the name of the topic itself mentions<br>
> "QueryParser Re-implementation ", I would definitely go<br>
> for re-implementation rather than adding to the existing implementation.<br>
<br>
</div>I wouldn't get too hung up on the idea title - the important aspect of<br>
the project is solving the issues that the current implementation has,<br>
rather than exactly how to achieve that. If it can be done without a<br>
complete rewrite, that's great.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Olly<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>