[Xapian-discuss] Ruby Bindings

[James Aylett]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:35:33AM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:

> > That's (probably) no longer a problem, but unserialise() returning a
> > pointer is raising warnings that this is considered
> > 'dangerous'.
> 
> It's a factory function, so SWIG may need to be told that (%newobject
> IIRC).

That doesn't fix the warning, although it's probably needed anyway (it
is %newobject).

> > This all with 1.3.40,
>  
> Is that the in-tree SWIG "1.3.40"?  That may not be the same as the
> released 1.3.40.

Yeah, our in-tree one.

> Please open a ticket with your findings though.

<http://trac.xapian.org/ticket/401>

J

-- 
  James Aylett

  talktorex.co.uk - xapian.org - uncertaintydivision.org