RESTful xapian server needs help
Olly Betts
olly at survex.com
Tue Mar 15 05:26:33 GMT 2016
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 09:43:41AM -0600, German M. Bravo wrote:
> Please help us. We have two options, but this is very important for us
> to get either of one (preferably option A) committed for the next
> version of xapian-core, otherwise the server wouldn't compile or
> wouldn't be fully featured with out-of-the-box xapian and our efforts
> would have been useless for the community for the whole time until the
> next stable version of xapian.
I think most of this has been addressed by or obsoleted by more recent
discussions on IRC.
But I think the key points from those discussions are worth noting here,
as not everyone idles on IRC or reads the channel logs:
* It's really way too late to be trying to push for major new features
to go in before 1.4.0 - this email back in October was effectively the
last call: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.general/9891
We've already made a number of hard-nosed decisions about things to
cut.
* However, almost everything you want to do can be achieved by adding
API methods, so can be added in 1.4.x.
* You need to focus on anything which can't be done in 1.4.x, and you
don't have much time - we're probably a few weeks away from a release
at this point. If someone has a sane patch including tests and
documentation ready to go, I'm unlikely to reject it, but I'm also
unlikely to hold the release for it. By "sane" I mean a patch I don't
have to iterate much on, which has a low risk/reward ratio, etc. I'm
likely to get more conservative as we close in on 1.4.0.
* Open tickets in trac for things! And with a sensible granularity. If
there's not a ticket in trac for something, it essentially doesn't
exist from the point of view of release planning.
Cheers,
Olly
More information about the Xapian-discuss
mailing list